music or languages

[paulo]

last year i began improving my guitar skills but i notice i no longer like music the way i used to like, so i thought of focusing on teaching languages or translating.
But some people say teaching is output, Master Yu`s course says teaching is resource. I think one needs resource(knowledge) and output(expression). Do you agree?

Funny that i wasnt the only person complaining that his english deteorated rather than improved, since joining English forums!!

[Danny VdB]

Paulo,

Everybody can generate some Output, even if it is not present in the chart.
This is because the DM can always generate Output.
My chart has no Output whatsoever, but you cannot say that I am not talking or doing anything ( I actually speak 5 languages by now..)

Having no Resources can mean the person has not so much ideas of his own, but he can always teach knowledge he has found somewhere else ( e.g. in books..).
Several charts of popes or dalai lamas have no Resource and lot of Output.
They are ideal people to pass on and teach old teachings and scriptures, because they will not mix it with their own ideas so much...

With any kind of chart it is possible be a teacher, but you will be a different type of teacher.
If there is strong Resource you will teach your own ideas, if you have no Resource then you can repackage and sell old teachings..
If you have lot of Output, you will tell more than you know.
If you have no Output, you will know more than you tell.

The 4P chart itself never says *what* you will do in life and when.
It more says something *how* you will do something *if* you do it...
The choice itself (to do something or not) is always in your hands, and never in your chart..
More I cannot say.


Danny

[paulo]

in my caee thers only output, but since i appear to be fake follow son, it may be a bit of both as follow sons dont need resource to be able to have their own ideas. But yes i tend to «appeal to the authoritative teaching of others«

[Danny VdB]

It is not rare for people without Resource to pick up ideas from all kind of sources. This can easily lead to a situation of not knowing whom or what to believe anymore..

Usually the person solves this in one of two possible ways:
1) Become a very fanatic believer of a certain set of ideas (usually from one authority), and become very closed for all other possibilities. For the person this solves the problem of forever being swayed between different opinions.
2) Become a professional critic (e.g. journalist), by exploring and exposing the different merits, or lack of them, in each of the going approaches proposed by the various "authorities".

#1 is the professional believer, #2 is the professional non-believer
But both are basically the same..

[Alexey Skoblikov]

Danny... Still I suppose that your 5 languages are the result of your strong Resources (what else you might have :) otherwise).

But of course your last paragraph is absolutely true! *how* *if*!

[Anna]

Hi Paulo,

Do you mean deteRIOrated?

Anna

[paulo]

yep